Saturday, August 13, 2016

Finns are rather poor



Finland versus the world - Meh


According to OECD (1), Finnish households have pretty much the lowest mean net wealth within the OECD. The diagram below shows that only Slovak Republic households are more poor, than the Finnish.

The average (mean) household in Finland only has a net wealth (net worth) of around 130k euros and a median household net worth around 80k. (I estimated the number from the diagram below so the numbers are not totally accurate.

The OECD average household net worth is about 220k. Other European nations like the UK, Spain or Belgium have more than double mean and median net worth. A certain precidental candidate would probably call this situation ”Sad.” and for once he'd be right!

Mean and median net wealth per household in selected OECD countries, 2010 or latest available year, values in 2005 USD PPPs.

Finland versus Finland - you need to sit down!


If we then look at the Finnish net worth data (2) in more detail we make stunning conclusions. I really hope you're sitting down for these two!

The first of the two tables below shows the net worth of Finnish households by different fractions and age brackets within the population.

Household reference person age Number of households (thousands) P10 P25 (lower quartile) P50 (median) P75 (upper quartile) P90 P95 P99 (aka ”the 1%”) Average
All households 2622,5 50 10 000 110 000 252 116 458 673 655 092 1 350 122 195 332
Under 25 163,7 -5 338 -547 1 791 12 000 40 246 117 938 386 698 19 684
25-34 409,1 -11 165 0 15 759 75 976 177 600 277 457 1 092 402 70 691
35-44 389,4 80 17 944 109 315 238 516 422 910 592 303 1 301 458 192 767
45-54 466,3 760 34 196 152 292 305 707 535 405 766 782 1 403 161 231 805
55-64 483,9 1 000 52 976 167 693 335 601 572 704 813 221 1 733 005 264 078
65-74 374,2 3 250 79 011 186 663 334 460 568 994 773 406 1 725 706 276 495
Over 75 335,9 2 008 62 812 150 312 251 163 391 425 603 473 1 109 891 195 622


The fractions mean a euro limit that is the highest value within that group, e.g., P25 means 25% of households are below that number and P90 means 10% of households are above that number. People don't accumulate more net worth during their years of employment. They just don't save. This looks kind of bad but still somehow manageable..

But there's a caveat: most of people's net worth is in their homes and appartments. The next table tells a much more dire story. This table lists the households' financial assets including stocks, bonds and mutual funds.

Household reference person age Number of households (thousands) P10 P25 (lower quartile) P50 (median) P75 (upper quartile) P90 P95 P99 (aka ”the 1%”) Average
All households 2622,5 350 2 000 9 098 32 099 94 698 170 935 625 334 50 373
Under 25 163,7 60 500 1 570 7 189 18 000 30 000 85 232 8 316
25-34 409,1 300 1 100 5 000 16 039 40 610 71 190 236 922 22 658
35-44 389,4 350 2 006 10 000 29 052 73 682 133 938 585 480 51 514
45-54 466,3 500 2 685 11 000 36 186 106 920 180 338 800 790 52 973
55-64 483,9 306 2 500 13 850 57 500 145 978 252 222 851 823 72 253
65-74 374,2 500 2 988 13 897 50 000 133 334 219 003 877 849 73 308
Over 75 335,9 700 2 512 10 000 32 000 92 190 166 944 461 209 42 624

What the?! The medians for all relevant age groups are only around 10k euros. I find these numbers to be really low; even people who are able to save some money are not really investing that money to make more money. People should let the magic of compounding work for their benefit.


So where do I fit in? Your's truly is upper quartile based on net worth and even top 5% based on financial assets as most of my assets are in my portfolio. There's a lot of work left to move more to the right.

References